New Page 1
 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  January 2010 Edition

Newsletter Sign up!

The NewJurist Magazine is based in the EU                   

Editor Contact

Please contact the editor at: editor@newjurist.com

Advertising

Please contact us at: info@newjurist.com

 

 

 

Homepage l Contact

Obama Spells New Hope for Human Rights 

By: Marjorie Cohn

Celebrations of Barack Obama’s election as President of the United States erupted in countries around the world. From Europe to Africa to the Middle East, people were jubilant.

After suffering though eight years of an administration that violated more human rights than any other in U.S. history, Obama spells hope for a new day.

While George W. Bush was President, I wrote Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law, which chronicled his war of aggression, policy of torture, illegal killings, unlawful Guantánamo detentions, and secret spying on Americans.

When the book was published, it seemed unimaginable that we could elect a President who would turn those policies around. But the election of Obama holds that potential.

This is the first in a series of articles in which I will suggest how the Obama administration can start undoing some of the damage Bush wrought, by ratifying three of the major human rights treaties and the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court.

Although the U.S. government frequently criticizes other countries for their human rights transgressions, the United States has been one of the most flagrant violators.

We have refused to ratify the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR); the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW); and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). And while the United States worked with other countries for 50 years to create the International Criminal Court, it has failed to ratify that treaty as well.

When we ratify a treaty, it becomes part of U.S. law under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.

In this article, I will explain why the United States should ratify the ICESCR, which is particularly relevant now that we are in the midst of the most serious economic crisis since the Great Depression.

In 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, whose New Deal helped lift us out of the Depression, gave his famous Four Freedoms Speech, focused on freedom of speech and expression, freedom to worship, freedom from want, and freedom from fear.

Roosevelt fleshed out the freedom from want and fear principles in his Economic Bill of Rights.

It contained equality of opportunity, the right to a job and a decent wage, the end of special privileges for the few, universal civil liberties, and guaranteed old-age pensions, unemployment insurance and medical care.

FDR’s bill of rights formed the basis for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which Eleanor Roosevelt helped draft, and which the U.N. General Assembly adopted in 1949.

The Declaration embraced two types of human rights: civil and political rights on the one hand; and economic, social and cultural rights on the other.

These rights were codified in two binding treaties: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).

The United States ratified the ICCPR in 1992. But it has refused to commit itself to the protection of economic, social and cultural rights. Since the Reagan administration, there has been a policy to define human rights in terms of civil and political rights, but to dismiss economic, social and cultural rights as akin to social welfare, or socialism.

Indeed, the United States' inhumane policy toward Cuba exemplifies this dichotomy.

The U.S. government has criticized civil and political rights in Cuba while disregarding Cubans' superior access to universal housing, health care, education and public accommodations, and its guarantee of paid maternity leave and equal pay rates.

The refusal to enshrine rights such as employment, education, food, housing, and health care in U.S. law is the reason the United States has not ratified the ICESCR.

This treaty contains the right to work in just and favorable conditions, to an adequate standard of living, to the highest attainable standards of physical and mental health, to education, to housing, and to enjoyment of the benefits of cultural freedom and scientific progress. It also guarantees equal rights for men and women, the right to work, the right to form and join trade unions, the right to social security and social insurance, and protection and assistance to the family.

In the United States, more than 10 million people are unemployed, 2 to 3 million families are homeless each year, and 46 million have no health care benefits. Untold numbers lost their retirement savings when the stock market crashed. Obama has pledged to give the rebuilding of our economy top priority after he is sworn in as President. He promised to create jobs and to ensure that all Americans are covered by health insurance.

When Obama said he would cut taxes for 95 percent of the people but end the tax cuts for the rich, he was criticized for wanting to “spread the wealth.” But Obama’s plan is fully consistent with our progressive income tax system. After the election, 15,000 physicians called for a single-payer health care plan, which Obama and Congress should seriously consider.

The United States’ flouting of the United Nations in its unilateral war on Iraq, and torture of prisoners in Afghanistan, Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and Iraq, has engendered widespread condemnation in the international community.

Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh, citing Professor Louis Henkin, summarized the hypocrisy of the United States in the area of human rights as follows: “In the cathedral of human rights, the U.S. is more like a flying buttress than a pillar – choosing to stand outside the international structure supporting the international human rights system but without being willing to subject its own conduct to the scrutiny of the system.”

We should encourage President Obama to send the ICESCR to the Senate for advice and consent to ratification. Becoming a party to that treaty will help not only the people in this country; it will also engender respect for the United States around the world.

About the Author:

Marjorie Cohn, a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and president of the National Lawyers Guild, served as a judge on the International Peoples’ Tribunal of Conscience in Support of the Vietnamese Victims of Agent Orange.

She is a member of the Bureau of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers. Her latest book is Rules of Disengagement.

 Share/Bookmark


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Previous Articles

Obama Spells New Hope for Human Rights 
An article by Marjorie Cohn examines how Obama's election could spell hope for human rights. Read
Agent Orange Continues to Poison Vietnam
An article by Marjorie Cohn examines the devastating effects of Agent Orange. Read
Frivolous Lawsuits 
In this article, Gerard Simington examines your options with a frivolous lawsuit. Read
Law School Accreditation
An examination of law school accreditation and what it means to you. Read
Racist Regimes in the 20th Century
Heather Gray examines overtly racist regimes in the 20th Century. Read
The IRAQ Approach
Chuck Milan writes on how to apply the IRAQ approach in law school examinations. Read
Website Terms & Conditions
Daniel Pepper examines whether you need website terms and conditions. Read
Attractive Jurisdiction
Panama is considered to be an attractive jurisdiction for opening your business. Read
On the Holocaust
In a short, yet powerful article, freelance author Mey Elghusein writes about the horrors of the Holocaust. Read
The IRAQ Approach
Chuck Milan writes on how to apply the IRAQ approach in law school examinations. Read

Archived Articles

A Critical Evaluation of Murder
Thomas Gallagher's evaluation of the crime of murder and its definition. Read
Online Law Degrees
Online Law Degrees: Are they Really Worth it? Peter Loughlin writes about online law degrees. Read
Estate Planning Overview Part I
Part I of a two part article series on the subject of Estate Planning by attorney Paul Nicolosi. Read
Estate Planning Overview Part II
Part II of a two part article series on the subject of Estate Planning by attorney Paul Nicolosi. Read
Power Learning
In the article, Peter Loughlin writes about online learning, and getting by with online college degree studies. Read
Private Investigators Part I
Part I of the article about private investigators and what they do, and the nature of the profession. Read
Private Investigators Part II
Part II of the article about private investigators and what they do, and the nature of the profession. Read
Private Investigators Part III
Part III of the article about private investigators and what they do, and the nature of the profession. Read
McDonald's Coffee Case
One of the most widely misreported and misunderstood cases in recent memory is the McDonald's Coffee case. Read
The Difference Between Arbitration & Mediation
In this article, Mark Eisenberg explains the difference between arbitration and mediation. Read 
Imprisonment in the Era of Enlightment and Today
Sharon White writes about imprisonment in the era of enlightment and today. Read
The D.C. Bar Option
Jose Gomez, writes about the D.C. Bar option. Read 

 

 

International Courts:

European Courts                                         

▪ European Court of Human Rights
▪ European Court of Justice

United States Courts

▪ U.S. Supreme Court
▪ U.S. Courts of Appeals
▪ U.S. District Courts
▪ U.S. Bankruptcy Courts
▪ United States Courts of International Trade

International Courts

▪ International Court of Justice
▪ International Criminal Court

 

 

> NewJurist. Stay Informed!

 

US Federal Rules:                                 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
Federal Rules of Evidence
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure

 

 

 

  The NewJurist.... An International Law Magazine ©

 

 Mission Statement l Editorial Guidelines l Terms & Conditions l Webmaster l Contact                                                                                         

 The NewJurist was founded by Dr. M M. Elghusein. The NewJurist is based in the European Union